Difference between revisions of "Symmetry and Relations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "To realize why Double Entry Bookkeeping is grounded in many profound ideas, one may start with Yoneda Lemma, a concept that can be summarized as Tai-Danae Bradley's st...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
2. The properties of a mathematical object are more important than its definition<ref extends="perspective">The properties of objects may contain more information than formal definitions.</ref>. | 2. The properties of a mathematical object are more important than its definition<ref extends="perspective">The properties of objects may contain more information than formal definitions.</ref>. | ||
The two statements above show that Double-Entry Bookkeeping is a numeric version of content invariance/symmetry over time. | The two statements above show that Double-Entry Bookkeeping is a numeric version of content invariance/symmetry over time. | ||
<noinclude> | |||
=References= | |||
<references/> | |||
=Related Pages= | |||
</noinclude> | |||
Revision as of 17:03, 24 February 2022
To realize why Double Entry Bookkeeping is grounded in many profound ideas, one may start with Yoneda Lemma, a concept that can be summarized as Tai-Danae Bradley's statements on her blog[1]:
1. Mathematical objects are completely determined by their relationships to other objectsCite error: Invalid<ref>tag; invalid names, e.g. too many. 2. The properties of a mathematical object are more important than its definitionCite error: Invalid<ref>tag; invalid names, e.g. too many.
The two statements above show that Double-Entry Bookkeeping is a numeric version of content invariance/symmetry over time.