Difference between revisions of "Compatibility"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "In Jeremy Mann's lecture on Intro to Category Theory series, the notion of compatibility has a formal and generalized meaning. It can be u...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[Jeremy Mann]]'s lecture on [[Intro to Category Theory|Intro to Category Theory]] series, the notion of [[compatibility]] has a formal and generalized meaning. It can be understood as a kind of [[type identity]].
In [[Jeremy Mann]]'s lecture on [[Intro to Category Theory|Intro to Category Theory]] series<ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory I: the Data of a Category}}</ref><ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory II: Elementary Examples}}</ref><ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory III: More Mathematical Examples}}</ref><ref name="equivalence">{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory IV: A Notion of Equivalence}}</ref>, the notion of [[compatibility]] is presented in a systematic and generalizable sense. It requires the audience to watch the full sequence to see why [[compatibility]] is such a useful concept in understanding [[Category Theory]]. It can be understood as a kind of [[type identity]]. In other words, [[compatibility]] is a loose kind of [[equivalence]]<ref name="equivalence" /> property.
 
<noinclude>
=References=
<references/>
=Related Pages=
[[Category:Category Theory]]
[[Category:Meta Mathematics]]
[[Category:Software Engineering]]
[[Category:Data Science]]
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 03:56, 27 March 2022

In Jeremy Mann's lecture on Intro to Category Theory series[1][2][3][4], the notion of compatibility is presented in a systematic and generalizable sense. It requires the audience to watch the full sequence to see why compatibility is such a useful concept in understanding Category Theory. It can be understood as a kind of type identity. In other words, compatibility is a loose kind of equivalence[4] property.


References

Related Pages