Difference between revisions of "Meta physics"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Meta physics is about the describing the origin of physical phenomena, which needs to be neutral or thinking above the abstraction level of physical realms. The only instrument for studying meta physics without entangling the argument with a particular phenomenon, it is necessary to ground the method of study in a form of medium that is totally abstract. Therefore, to represent the mechanisms of physical phenomena without being limited by physical resources, we need to use a dimensionless and physically independent medium. In other words, we need to conduct this study using scale-free data structures. Unfortunately, knowing that all data content must be physically grounded in mechanisms that cannot go beyond [[Planck scale]], which is physics based, we do have a catch-22 at hand, which is often referred to as [[Platonism]] in the field of philosophy.
Meta physics is about describing the origin of physical phenomena, which needs to be neutral or thinking above the abstraction level of physical realms. The only instrument for studying meta physics without entangling the argument with a particular phenomenon, it is necessary to ground the method of study in a form of medium that is totally abstract. Therefore, to represent the mechanisms of physical phenomena without being limited by physical resources, we need to use a dimensionless and physically independent medium. In other words, we need to conduct this study using scale-free data structures. Unfortunately, knowing that all data content must be physically grounded in mechanisms that cannot go beyond [[Planck scale]], which is physics based, we do have a catch-22 at hand, which is often referred to as [[Platonism]] in the field of philosophy.


I was impressed by Mike Ivsin's book on [[Book/Quantum Pythagoreans|Quantum Pythagoreans]]<ref>{{:Book/Quantum Pythagoreans}}</ref>.
I was impressed by Mike Ivsin's book on [[Book/Quantum Pythagoreans|Quantum Pythagoreans]]<ref>{{:Book/Quantum Pythagoreans}}</ref>.
Line 7: Line 7:
<references/>
<references/>
==Related Pages==
==Related Pages==
*[[Is in field::Logic]]
*[[Is in field::Cognitive Science]]
{{#ask: [[Category:Symmetry]] | [[Category:Meta physics]]
{{#ask: [[Category:Symmetry]] | [[Category:Meta physics]]
|format=category
|format=category
Line 14: Line 16:
[[Category:Spacetime]]
[[Category:Spacetime]]
[[Category:Meta physics]]
[[Category:Meta physics]]
[[Category:Meta Physics]]
</noinclude>
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 07:58, 27 March 2022

Meta physics is about describing the origin of physical phenomena, which needs to be neutral or thinking above the abstraction level of physical realms. The only instrument for studying meta physics without entangling the argument with a particular phenomenon, it is necessary to ground the method of study in a form of medium that is totally abstract. Therefore, to represent the mechanisms of physical phenomena without being limited by physical resources, we need to use a dimensionless and physically independent medium. In other words, we need to conduct this study using scale-free data structures. Unfortunately, knowing that all data content must be physically grounded in mechanisms that cannot go beyond Planck scale, which is physics based, we do have a catch-22 at hand, which is often referred to as Platonism in the field of philosophy.

I was impressed by Mike Ivsin's book on Quantum Pythagoreans[1].


References

  1. Ivsin, Mike (July 31, 2006). Quantum Pythagoreans (2nd ed.). local page: Lulu.com. ISBN 978-1847288486. 

Related Pages