Difference between revisions of "Causality"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{#ev:youtube |" to "{{#widget:YouTube |id=")
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiEntry|key=Causality|qCode=179289}} is an assertion that states that one event is the direct consequence of the other. The mathematical model of [[causality]] has been investigated by [[Judea Pearl]]<ref>{{:Book/Causality}}</ref><ref>{{:Book/The Book of Why}}</ref>. In the book:[[Book/Picturing Quantum Processes|Picturing Quantum Processes]]<ref name="PQP">{{:Book/Picturing Quantum Processes}}</ref><ref extends="PQP">Section 10.2.1 '''Causality''', P.636</ref>, the following statement is said about causality.
{{WikiEntry|key=Causality|qCode=179289}} is an assertion that states that one event is the direct consequence of the other. The mathematical model of [[causality]] has been investigated by [[Judea Pearl]]<ref name=causality>{{:Book/Causality}}</ref><ref name=why>{{:Book/The Book of Why}}</ref>. In the book:[[Book/Picturing Quantum Processes|Picturing Quantum Processes]]<ref name="PQP">{{:Book/Picturing Quantum Processes}}</ref><ref extends="PQP">Section 10.2.1 '''Causality''', P.636</ref>, the following statement is said about causality.
=Key Opinion Leaders=
=Key Opinion Leaders=
==Judea Pearl's Interpretation of Causality==
==Judea Pearl's Interpretation of Causality==
[[Judea Pearl]] literally created a science and a model of computation on this subject matter. He has a one hour video<ref>{{:Video/Keynote: Judea Pearl - The New Science of Cause and Effect}}</ref> on this subject.
[[Judea Pearl]] literally created a science<ref name=why/> and a model of computation<ref name=causality/> on this subject matter. He has a one hour video<ref>{{:Video/Keynote: Judea Pearl - The New Science of Cause and Effect}}</ref> on this subject.
{{#ev:youtube
{{#widget:YouTube
|ZaPV1OSEpHw
|id=ZaPV1OSEpHw
}}
}}
==Leslie Lamport's Interpretation of Causality==
[[Leslie Lamport]] created the [[Lamport Algorithm]] which provides a infrastructure to synchronize or give logical time ordering of events across distributed systems. In this paper:[[Paper/Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System|Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System]]<ref>{{:Paper/Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System}}</ref>, he not only presents the algorithm required to prescribe the algorithm, he also invoked his understanding of the physical meaning of causality, and talked about the use of [[state machine]] as a model of computation to help him think through the system.
{{#widget:YouTube
|id=nfRouGH0oMg
|width=640
|height=360
}}
==Bob Coecke's Interpretation of Causality==
==Bob Coecke's Interpretation of Causality==
[[Bob Coecke]] talked about causality in his talk:[[Video/Bob Coecke: From quantum processes to cognition via pictures|From quantum processes to cognition via pictures]]. He even stated that a simple diagram with just one discard symbol can represent the entire [[Theory of Relativity]].
[[Bob Coecke]] talked about causality in this video<ref>{{:Video/Bob Coecke: From quantum processes to cognition via pictures}}</ref>:[[Video/Bob Coecke: From quantum processes to cognition via pictures|From quantum processes to cognition via pictures]]. He even stated that a simple diagram with just one discard symbol can represent the entire [[Theory of Relativity]]. One may also look at the video<ref>{{:Video/Causal Influence in Quantum Theory}}</ref> by [[Jonathan Barrett]].
{{#ev:youtube
{{#widget:YouTube
|h84CtK33Q8s|||||start=3000&end=3200
|id=h84CtK33Q8s|||||start=3000&end=3200
}}
}}
  If the output of a process is discarded, it may as well have never happened.
  If the output of a process is discarded, it may as well have never happened.
Line 16: Line 25:
==Kyle Cranmer's Interpretation on Causality==
==Kyle Cranmer's Interpretation on Causality==
Kyle Cranmer has a 90 minute video<ref>{{:Video/Causality at the Intersection of Simulation, Inference, Science, and Learning}}</ref> on [[Causality]].
Kyle Cranmer has a 90 minute video<ref>{{:Video/Causality at the Intersection of Simulation, Inference, Science, and Learning}}</ref> on [[Causality]].
{{#ev:youtube
{{#widget:YouTube
|44p9fAh3HAA|||||start=426
|id=44p9fAh3HAA|||||start=426
}}
}}


==Sean Carroll's Interpretation on Causality==
==Sean Carroll's Interpretation on Causality==
[[Sean Carroll]] has an 80 minute video<ref>{{:Video/The Arrow of Time in Causal Networks}}</ref> on [[Causality]].
[[Sean Carroll]] has an 80 minute video<ref>{{:Video/The Arrow of Time in Causal Networks}}</ref> on [[Causality]].
{{#ev:youtube
{{#widget:YouTube
|6slug9rjaIQ
|id=6slug9rjaIQ
}}
}}
<noinclude>
<noinclude>

Latest revision as of 11:24, 26 August 2022

Causality(Q179289) is an assertion that states that one event is the direct consequence of the other. The mathematical model of causality has been investigated by Judea Pearl[1][2]. In the book:Picturing Quantum Processes[3]Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many, the following statement is said about causality.

Key Opinion Leaders

Judea Pearl's Interpretation of Causality

Judea Pearl literally created a science[2] and a model of computation[1] on this subject matter. He has a one hour video[4] on this subject.

Leslie Lamport's Interpretation of Causality

Leslie Lamport created the Lamport Algorithm which provides a infrastructure to synchronize or give logical time ordering of events across distributed systems. In this paper:Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System[5], he not only presents the algorithm required to prescribe the algorithm, he also invoked his understanding of the physical meaning of causality, and talked about the use of state machine as a model of computation to help him think through the system.

Bob Coecke's Interpretation of Causality

Bob Coecke talked about causality in this video[6]:From quantum processes to cognition via pictures. He even stated that a simple diagram with just one discard symbol can represent the entire Theory of Relativity. One may also look at the video[7] by Jonathan Barrett.

If the output of a process is discarded, it may as well have never happened.

Please also look up the following sections related to causalityCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too manyCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too manyCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too manyCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too manyCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too manyCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many.

Kyle Cranmer's Interpretation on Causality

Kyle Cranmer has a 90 minute video[8] on Causality.

Sean Carroll's Interpretation on Causality

Sean Carroll has an 80 minute video[9] on Causality.


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Pearl, Judea (Jun 4, 2011). Causality: Models Reasoning, and Inference. local page: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521773621. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Pearl, Judea (2018). The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. local page: Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-09761-6. 
  3. Coecke, Bob; Kissinger, Aleks (2017). Picturing Quantum Processes. local page: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1316219317. 
  4. Pearl, Judea (Nov 30, 2018). Keynote: Judea Pearl - The New Science of Cause and Effect. local page: PyData. 
  5. Lamport, Leslie (July 1978). "Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System" (PDF). 21 (7). local page: Communication of ACM. 
  6. Coecke, Bob (Nov 14, 2017). Bob Coecke: From quantum processes to cognition via pictures. local page: Latvijas Universitāte. 
  7. Barrett, Jonathan (Apr 30, 2022). Causal Influence in Quantum Theory. local page: Simons Institute. 
  8. Cranmer, Kyle (Mar 21, 2022). Causality at the Intersection of Simulation, Inference, Science, and Learning. local page: YaleUniversity. 
  9. Carroll, Sean (Apr 23, 2022). The Arrow of Time in Causal Networks. local page: Simons Institute. 

Related Pages