Difference between revisions of "Ideation Notebook"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Ideation]] | |||
== Ideation Notebook == | == Ideation Notebook == |
Revision as of 16:46, 7 July 2021
Ideation Notebook
TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model
to Template:LogicModel
1. Context |
| ||
2. Goal |
| ||
3. Success Criteria |
| ||
4. Outputs | 5. Process | 6. Inputs | |
|
|
| |
7. Boundary Conditions |
|
Note-taking is crucial when one comes across complex knowledge and emerging ideas. Facing multiple streams of data, a note-taker takes a perspective, observe and focus at the data, and come out with writable information. The information are written down along with the mindstream of the note-taker, and are then organized by note-taker with the aid of the notebook environment.
The digital notebook environment allows faster note-taking speed but limited expressibility of concept relations. A natural way of note-taking is to draw down concepts and relate them, which is flexable for quick organization and comprehension of fractions of knowledge. However, the process is inferior to typing when concepts are easily expressed by language. The dilemma give rise to mindmap tools, which enable note-takers to express concepts and the relations among them. Nonetheless, this kind of tools lacks expressibility for more general structure of knowledge, and even inhibits the thinking process.
The process of note-taking shares similar factors with coding. Coders need to transform ideas into codes and relate and organize concepts, while the IDEs really understand the semantics and provide corresponding interactions, increasing the efficiency of the development process. It expose the lack of semantic assistance of the note-taking environment.
This issue motivates us to propose a framework of a note-taking environment, Ideaiton Notebook, which enable users describe data and execute knowledge management functions efficiently. The notebook enhances the cognition of users by providing interactions, which can be further configured efficiently to satisfy a wide range of knowledge development scene.
The value of the notebook to a user depends on user context, which offers motivation of knowledge development. It also depends on the user's understanding and proficiency to utilize the hybrid of natural language and formal language. Finally, the user's surrounding of data streams needs to be rich and fluid, which leads to another proposal of Ideation Channels.