Difference between revisions of "Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 19: Line 19:
* [[Chat/Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung]]
* [[Chat/Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung]]
* [[Video/Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung]]
* [[Video/Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung]]
* The transcription of these data triggers the session to structure the data, which is in another Logic Model
* These data generated from the synchronous meeting triggers the asynchronous session to further discuss and structure them , which is in another Logic Model.


== Meta ==  
== Meta ==  

Latest revision as of 12:34, 25 August 2021

Start time 2021-08-25T08:00:00.000Z
End time 2021-08-25T09:30:00.000Z
Attendees @BenKoo, @KevinTung
Context TLA Workflow/Process/Planning
Goal Discuss About TLA Workflow
Criteria The neccasary information is communicated
Meeting URL https://zoom.us/j/92921308938?pwd=dFhwSXBreDBmd3ZLSHIzNkplaHVvUT09


Input


Process

Output

Meta

The current strategy of managing the Chat data is to place the structure of the data as its prefix, and the semantics as its postfix. Such as

Chat/Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung
Video/Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTun

As the structure of data is limited, the top-level of the namespace is more compact. However, it is also possible to use the primary semantic of the data as its prefix, such as

Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung/Chat
Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung/Video

The possible benefit is to have better control over the resources under the prefix, which is a common practice. It is also possible to use multiple hierarchical structures to manage ontologies. So there will be fixed structure and fluid structure.

I think it is an important part of Namespace Management open to discussion.