Difference between revisions of "What is a Thing?"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Martin Heidegger is the author of the book<ref>{{:Book/What is a Thing?}}</ref> titled:"What is a Thing". In the paper<ref>{{:Paper/What is a Thing?}}</ref> under the same name, Heidegger was quoted:
Martin Heidegger is the author of the book<ref>{{:Book/What is a Thing?}}</ref> titled:"What is a Thing". In the paper<ref>{{:Paper/What is a Thing?}}</ref> under the same name, Heidegger was quoted:
  From the range of the basic questions of metaphysics we shall here ask this one question: What is a thing? The question is quite old. What remains ever new about it is merely that it must be asked again and again.
  From the range of the basic questions of metaphysics we shall here ask this one question: What is a thing? The question is quite old. What remains ever new about it is merely that it must be asked again and again.
=A transition to formalism=
[https://youtu.be/ecHgsEI5CRs?t=1010 Jean Pierre Marquis talks about how Bourbaki group started to represent a thing structurally]<ref>{{:Video/Bourbaki, Categories and Structuralism, Jean Pierre Marquis}}</ref>
==Symmetry and Relations==
{{:Symmetry and Relations}}
<noinclude>
=References=
<references/>
=Related Pages=
[[Category:Structuralism]]
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 17:08, 24 February 2022

Martin Heidegger is the author of the book[1] titled:"What is a Thing". In the paper[2] under the same name, Heidegger was quoted:

From the range of the basic questions of metaphysics we shall here ask this one question: What is a thing? The question is quite old. What remains ever new about it is merely that it must be asked again and again.

A transition to formalism

Jean Pierre Marquis talks about how Bourbaki group started to represent a thing structurally[3]

Symmetry and Relations

To realize why Double Entry Bookkeeping is grounded in many profound ideas, one may start with Yoneda Lemma, a concept that can be summarized as Tai-Danae Bradley's statements on her blog[4]:

1. Mathematical objects are completely determined by their relationships to other objectsCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many.
2. The properties of a mathematical object are more important than its definitionCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many.

The two statements above show that Double-Entry Bookkeeping is a numeric version of content invariance/symmetry over time.



References

  1. Heidegger, Martin (1967). What is a Thing?. local page: Regenery/Gateway. 
  2. Döring, A.; Isham, C. (2010). "What is a Thing?". local page: 753–937. ISBN 978-3-642-12821-9. 
  3. Marquis, Jean Pierre (Dec 8, 2019). Bourbaki, Categories and Structuralism, Jean Pierre Marquis. local page: Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies. 
  4. The Yoneda Perspective by Tai-Danae Bradley

Related Pages