Difference between revisions of "Talk:Time Management with timeline"
m (Benkoo moved page Talk:Time Management to Talk:Time Management with timeline) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Logic Model | {{Template:Logic Model | ||
|context= | |context=After repeatedly stated the necessity of the use of [[Logic Model]] to ground the semantics of each page, the lack of [[Logic Model]] in the current development of [[Time Management]] page, causes ongoing confusion in the developmental process of this demonstrative page. | ||
|goal=Use [[Logic Model]] to capture [[context]], [[goal]], [[Success Criteria|success criteria]] in Wiki. | |goal=Use [[Logic Model]] to capture [[context]], [[goal]], [[Success Criteria|success criteria]] in Wiki. | ||
|criteria=Seeing [[Logic Model]] as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes [[named entities]]. | |criteria=Seeing [[Logic Model]] as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes [[named entities]]. | ||
|outputs=A [[Logic Model]] written by each page's verifier in [[PKC]]. | |outputs=#A [[Logic Model]] written and verified by each page's verifier in [[PKC]]. | ||
|process=A compositional [[process]] to relate [[Inputs]] with [[Outputs]]. | |process=A compositional [[process]] to relate [[Inputs]] with [[Outputs]]. | ||
|inputs=#[[PKC]] access | |inputs=#[[PKC]] access | ||
# [[Content Creator]] | # [[Content Creator]] | ||
#[[Page Verification Process]] | #[[Page Verification Process]] | ||
|boundaries= | |boundaries= For people who insist on [[arrogance]] and [[stupidity]], [[Logic Model]] and will not be useful. | ||
}} | }} | ||
<noinclude> | |||
=Process Anti-Pattern Observation= | |||
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys ([[User:KevinTung|Kevin]] & [[User:Baliforester|Jared]]) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and re-usability of the chosen names. This mental laziness causes systematic misunderstanding, and most seriously, delayed the possibility to make progress in a reasonable speed. Moreover, the explicit statement that all of your actions must be put into a [[Logic Model]], which you both conveniently ignored, repeatedly caused our communication to go into directions that goes no where. This is really a sad condition that is now being documented here. One more time, all pages are specialization of the [[Logic Model]], and this page included, must have a [[Logic Model]]. --[[User:Benkoo|Benkoo]] ([[User talk:Benkoo|talk]]) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
</noinclude> | |||
I will try to include logic model with proper names in the pages that need to have logic model. --[[User:KevinTung|KevinTung]] ([[User talk:KevinTung|talk]]) 10:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:22, 4 April 2022
TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model
to Template:LogicModel
1. Context |
After repeatedly stated the necessity of the use of Logic Model to ground the semantics of each page, the lack of Logic Model in the current development of Time Management page, causes ongoing confusion in the developmental process of this demonstrative page. | ||
2. Goal |
Use Logic Model to capture context, goal, success criteria in Wiki. | ||
3. Success Criteria |
Seeing Logic Model as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes named entities. | ||
4. Outputs | 5. Process | 6. Inputs | |
|
|||
7. Boundary Conditions |
For people who insist on arrogance and stupidity, Logic Model and will not be useful. |
Process Anti-Pattern Observation
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys (Kevin & Jared) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and re-usability of the chosen names. This mental laziness causes systematic misunderstanding, and most seriously, delayed the possibility to make progress in a reasonable speed. Moreover, the explicit statement that all of your actions must be put into a Logic Model, which you both conveniently ignored, repeatedly caused our communication to go into directions that goes no where. This is really a sad condition that is now being documented here. One more time, all pages are specialization of the Logic Model, and this page included, must have a Logic Model. --Benkoo (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
I will try to include logic model with proper names in the pages that need to have logic model. --KevinTung (talk) 10:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)