Difference between revisions of "Talk:Time Management with timeline"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>
=Process Anti-Pattern Observation=
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys ([[User:KevinTung|Kevin]] & [[User:Baliforester|Jared]]) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and re-usability of the chosen names. This mental laziness causes systematic misunderstanding, and most seriously, delayed the possibility to make progress in a reasonable speed. Moreover, the explicit statement that all of your actions must be put into a [[Logic Model]], which you both conveniently ignored, repeatedly caused our communication to go into directions that goes no where. This is really a sad condition that is now being documented here. One more time, all pages are specialization of the [[Logic Model]], and this page included, must have a [[Logic Model]]. --[[User:Benkoo|Benkoo]] ([[User talk:Benkoo|talk]]) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
</noinclude>
{{Template:Logic Model
{{Template:Logic Model
|context=The lack of named spatial/temporal contexts will cause confusion in the process of communication
|context=After repeatedly stated the necessity of the use of [[Logic Model]] to ground the semantics of each page, the lack of [[Logic Model]] in the current development of [[Time Management]] page, causes ongoing confusion in the developmental process of this demonstrative page.
|goal=Use [[Logic Model]] to capture [[context]], [[goal]], [[Success Criteria|success criteria]] in Wiki.
|goal=Use [[Logic Model]] to capture [[context]], [[goal]], [[Success Criteria|success criteria]] in Wiki.
|criteria=Seeing [[Logic Model]] as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes [[named entities]].
|criteria=Seeing [[Logic Model]] as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes [[named entities]].
Line 13: Line 8:
# [[Content Creator]]  
# [[Content Creator]]  
#[[Page Verification Process]]
#[[Page Verification Process]]
|boundaries= The intersection of [[arrogance]] and [[stupidity]].
|boundaries= For people who insist on [[arrogance]] and [[stupidity]], [[Logic Model]] and will not be useful.
}}
}}
<noinclude>
=Process Anti-Pattern Observation=
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys ([[User:KevinTung|Kevin]] & [[User:Baliforester|Jared]]) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and re-usability of the chosen names. This mental laziness causes systematic misunderstanding, and most seriously, delayed the possibility to make progress in a reasonable speed. Moreover, the explicit statement that all of your actions must be put into a [[Logic Model]], which you both conveniently ignored, repeatedly caused our communication to go into directions that goes no where. This is really a sad condition that is now being documented here. One more time, all pages are specialization of the [[Logic Model]], and this page included, must have a [[Logic Model]]. --[[User:Benkoo|Benkoo]] ([[User talk:Benkoo|talk]]) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
</noinclude>
I will try to include logic model with proper names in the pages that need to have logic model. --[[User:KevinTung|KevinTung]] ([[User talk:KevinTung|talk]]) 10:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:22, 4 April 2022


TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model to Template:LogicModel

1. Context

After repeatedly stated the necessity of the use of Logic Model to ground the semantics of each page, the lack of Logic Model in the current development of Time Management page, causes ongoing confusion in the developmental process of this demonstrative page.

2. Goal

Use Logic Model to capture context, goal, success criteria in Wiki.

3. Success Criteria

Seeing Logic Model as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes named entities.

4. Outputs 5. Process 6. Inputs
  1. A Logic Model written and verified by each page's verifier in PKC.

A compositional process to relate Inputs with Outputs.

  1. PKC access
  2. Content Creator
  3. Page Verification Process
7. Boundary Conditions

For people who insist on arrogance and stupidity, Logic Model and will not be useful.


Process Anti-Pattern Observation

The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys (Kevin & Jared) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and re-usability of the chosen names. This mental laziness causes systematic misunderstanding, and most seriously, delayed the possibility to make progress in a reasonable speed. Moreover, the explicit statement that all of your actions must be put into a Logic Model, which you both conveniently ignored, repeatedly caused our communication to go into directions that goes no where. This is really a sad condition that is now being documented here. One more time, all pages are specialization of the Logic Model, and this page included, must have a Logic Model. --Benkoo (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

I will try to include logic model with proper names in the pages that need to have logic model. --KevinTung (talk) 10:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://pkc.pub/index.php?title=Talk:Time_Management_with_timeline&oldid=28947"