Inter-Organizational Workflow

Logic Model (PKC Workflow) Template:LogicModel 08 28, 2021
Abstract Specification Context This is the 2021 summer project of Tz-Chuang starting from June 27, 2021 to August 21,2021. Despite the various models for domain knowledge, there isn't a high-level model which is expressive, compact, practical, and independent of domains. This gives rise to Logic Model. Goal Utilize formal methods to prove the system's soundness Use Logic Model to describe the project itself. Theorize Logic Model based on the implementation. Success Criteria An example of how the formal method could integrate into Logic Model is demonstrated. The Logic Models of the project are defined correctly The core concepts which explain the Logic Model is defined.
Concrete Implementation Given Inputs When Process is executed... Then, we get Outputs System Verification Software/TLA+ Tools PKC System Specification Knowledge/TLA+ Tools Jenkins Integration Jenkins setup A service namespace Docker Registry Docker Docker registry tutorial Image Naming System Verification by TLA+ Jenkins Integration Docker Registry Meeting and Communication Issues Updates All activities PKC Workflow/Knowledge PKC Workflow/Drafts PKC Workflow/Project Conclusion PKC Workflow/Presentation
Boundary/Safety Conditions of PKC Workflow 6 weeks of project time.

Notes

• When writing a logic model, one should be aware of the difference between concept and instance.
• A logic model is composed of lots of submodels. When not intending to specify the abstract part of them, one could only use Function Model.
• What is the relationship between the model submodules, and the relationships among all the subfunctions?
• Note: Sometimes, the input and process are ambiguous. For example, the Service namespace is required to achieve the goal. It might be an input or the product along the process. In general, both the input and process contain uncertainty and need a decision.
• The parameter of Logic Model is minimized to its name, which is the most important part of it. The name should be summarized from its value.
• Note that, when naming as Jenkins, it means the resource itself, but when naming as Jenkin Implementation On PKC, it consists of more context information therefore is more suitable.
• I was intending to name "PKC Workflow/Jenkins Integration" for the PCK Workflow's submodel. However, a more proper name might be Task/Jenkins Integration, and then take its output to PKC Workflow/Automation. The organization of the PKC Workflow should be the project, and the Workflow should be the desired output of the project. The Task category is for moving to that state. So the task could be the process of a Project, and the output of the task could serve as the process of the workflow.
• Each goal is associated with a static plan and dynamic process.

• To specify input and output from a logic model, we could get the input/output on every subprocess in the process (by transclusion)
• I renamed some models
  • TLA+ Workflow -> System Verification
  • Docker Workflow -> Docker registry
  • Question: How should we name? Naming is a kind of summarization that loses information.