Difference between revisions of "Shut up and calculate!"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Shut up and calculate!''' is the motto and evidence of the fact that [[quantum physics]] is based on the thesis of universal [[computation]]. It is also the reason that many theoretical computing scientists are saying the the future of intellectual development will be based on [[quantum computing]]. This statement is not about [[quantum physics]], but [[meta physics]]. In other words, the future of all intellectual discourses should be supported on [[scale-free]] decisions that has explicit reasoning structures. | '''Shut up and calculate!'''<ref>Physics Today online, Could Feymann have said this?, https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1768652</ref> is the motto and evidence of the fact that [[quantum physics]] is based on the thesis of universal [[computation]]. It is also the reason that many theoretical computing scientists are saying the the future of intellectual development will be based on [[quantum computing]]. This statement is not about [[quantum physics]], but [[meta physics]]. In other words, the future of all intellectual discourses should be supported on [[scale-free]] decisions that has explicit reasoning structures. | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
=References= | |||
<references/> | |||
==Related Pages== | ==Related Pages== | ||
*[[Logically related::Data]] | *[[Logically related::Data]] | ||
Revision as of 05:01, 3 September 2021
Shut up and calculate![1] is the motto and evidence of the fact that quantum physics is based on the thesis of universal computation. It is also the reason that many theoretical computing scientists are saying the the future of intellectual development will be based on quantum computing. This statement is not about quantum physics, but meta physics. In other words, the future of all intellectual discourses should be supported on scale-free decisions that has explicit reasoning structures.
References
- ↑ Physics Today online, Could Feymann have said this?, https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1768652