Difference between revisions of "Accounting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Accounting and Accountability= | =Accounting and Accountability= | ||
Something is [[accountable]] or not, can be judged by whether all items are being [[accounted]] for during the project. | Something is [[accountable]] or not, can be judged by whether all items are being [[accounted]] for during the project. | ||
=History of Accounting= | |||
It would be useful to read the paper by Fitzgerald and Lin, on [[Paper/Quantum Information and Accounting Information: A Revolutionary Trend and | |||
the Role of Topology|Quantum Information and Accounting Information: A Revolutionary Trend and | |||
the Role of Topology]]. | |||
<noinclude> | |||
=References= | |||
<references/> | |||
=Related Pages= | |||
[[Category:Counting]] | [[Category:Counting]] | ||
</noinclude> | |||
Revision as of 10:32, 23 February 2022
Accounting can also be considered as abstract counting, which is a mechanism to keep causal relationships with documented rigor. The nature of keeping relationships traceable using trust-worthy documentation, yet objectively, and systematically verifiable, must all be grounded in the notion of information symmetry.
Accounting and Accountability
Something is accountable or not, can be judged by whether all items are being accounted for during the project.
History of Accounting
It would be useful to read the paper by Fitzgerald and Lin, on [[Paper/Quantum Information and Accounting Information: A Revolutionary Trend and the Role of Topology|Quantum Information and Accounting Information: A Revolutionary Trend and the Role of Topology]].