Difference between revisions of "Compatibility"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[Jeremy Mann]]'s lecture on [[Intro to Category Theory|Intro to Category Theory]] series<ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory I: the Data of a Category}}</ref><ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory II: Elementary Examples}}</ref><ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory III: More Mathematical Examples}}</ref><ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory IV: A Notion of Equivalence}}</ref>, the notion of [[compatibility]] has a formal and generalized meaning. It can be understood as a kind of [[type identity]]. In other words, [[compatibility]] is a loose kind of [[equivalence]]<ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory IV: A Notion of Equivalence}}</ref> property.
In [[Jeremy Mann]]'s lecture on [[Intro to Category Theory|Intro to Category Theory]] series<ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory I: the Data of a Category}}</ref><ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory II: Elementary Examples}}</ref><ref>{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory III: More Mathematical Examples}}</ref><ref name="equivalence">{{:Video/Intro to Category Theory IV: A Notion of Equivalence}}</ref>, the notion of [[compatibility]] has a formal and generalized meaning. It can be understood as a kind of [[type identity]]. In other words, [[compatibility]] is a loose kind of [[equivalence]]<ref name="equivalence" /> property.


<noinclude>
<noinclude>

Revision as of 03:54, 27 March 2022

In Jeremy Mann's lecture on Intro to Category Theory series[1][2][3][4], the notion of compatibility has a formal and generalized meaning. It can be understood as a kind of type identity. In other words, compatibility is a loose kind of equivalence[4] property.


References

Related Pages