Difference between revisions of "Science of Governance/Goal"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
<noinclude>
<noinclude>
<HR/>
<HR/>
The objective of this Governance Committee is to define a theme of data governance to address cross-domain concerns, therefore enabling effective data exchange in application scenarios that require interdisciplinary collaboration. The theme of governance is to be formulated as a protocol for interactions and relate these protocols to known decision-processes(human or machine executable algorithms), government regulations on data industries in general, existing industry practices/standards. We hope that the Governance Committee members will present their own thinkings on how a high-level data governance protocols can be formulated, identify established communities/institutions<ref>[https://www.hertie-school.org/en/digital-governance/about Hertie School: Center for Digital Governance, Berlin]</ref><ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/ Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University]</ref> of data governance practices<ref>{{:Web/Understanding and Embedding Design Justice in Design Processes}}</ref><ref>[[Open Access]]</ref>, and proposal solution strategies to form a meta data governance protocol. In other words, the protocol created by this Governance Committee on [[SoG]] will be a meta contract that invites a broad area of domain experts to submit their proposed conditions for fair and just cross-domain engagements. The evolution of this meta contract will be recorded digitally, timestamped, encrypted for protection of content security, and edited for publication until the consensus for contract publication is reached. The Byzantine Fault Tolerance of 2/3 majority wins the argument will be the initial rule of consensus criteria.
{{:Science of Governance/Goal/Main Text}}


{{PagePostfix
{{PagePostfix

Latest revision as of 03:42, 16 July 2022

Create a consensus-reaching process to resolve potential conflicts caused by interdisciplinary/cross-domain concerns.

The objective of this Governance Committee is to define a theme of data governance to address cross-domain concerns, therefore enabling effective data exchange in application scenarios that require interdisciplinary collaboration. The theme of governance is to be formulated as a protocol for interactions and relate these protocols to known decision-processes(human or machine executable algorithms), government regulations on data industries in general, existing industry practices/standards. We hope that the Governance Committee members will present their own thinkings on how a high-level data governance protocols can be formulated, identify established communities/institutions[1][2] of data governance practices[3][4], and proposal solution strategies to form a meta data governance protocol. In other words, the protocol created by this Governance Committee on SoG will be a meta contract that invites a broad area of domain experts to submit their proposed conditions for fair and just cross-domain engagements. The evolution of this meta contract will be recorded digitally, timestamped, encrypted for protection of content security, and edited for publication until the consensus for contract publication is reached. The Byzantine Fault Tolerance of 2/3 majority wins the argument will be the initial rule of consensus criteria.


References

  1. ↑ Hertie School: Center for Digital Governance, Berlin
  2. ↑ Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
  3. ↑ Ostrowski, Anastasia; Das, Madhurima (Jul 13, 2022). "Understanding and Embedding Design Justice in Design Processes". local page: Medium. 
  4. ↑ Open Access

Related Pages


Retrieved from "https://pkc.pub/index.php?title=Science_of_Governance/Goal&oldid=33447"