Difference between revisions of "Talk:Time Management with timeline"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys ([[User:KevinTung|Kevin]] & [[User:Baliforester|Jared]]) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most imminent in your own localized contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Truth", such as a single wiki, to ensure the consistency and reusability of the chosen names. --[[User:Benkoo|Benkoo]] ([[User talk:Benkoo|talk]]) 09:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys ([[User:KevinTung|Kevin]] & [[User:Baliforester|Jared]]) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and reusability of the chosen names. --[[User:Benkoo|Benkoo]] ([[User talk:Benkoo|talk]]) 09:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:28, 15 July 2021

The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys (Kevin & Jared) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and reusability of the chosen names. --Benkoo (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)