Difference between revisions of "Calculus:Limits"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
So the logic of the limit is approaching to not equal to. (what's the difference?)
So the logic of the limit is approaching to not equal to. (what's the difference?)


it will be like this when we say x=1 then x is on.
it will be like this:
 
When we say x=1 then x is on.


But if we say <math>x \to 1</math> then it could be 1.00000....0001 or 9.9999....999, x will not be 1 it will just be close to one.
But if we say <math>x \to 1</math> then it could be 1.00000....0001 or 9.9999....999, x will not be 1 it will just be close to one.

Revision as of 13:20, 24 September 2021

When you see this equation it means you are trying to let "x" approach "a".

You may have a question, "why can't we just write it as ?"

Sometimes we can't tell what F(a) equals.

example 1

Screen Shot 2021-08-28 at 8.02.52 PM.png

But If a = 1 then you will get

Denominator can't be 0 so it is undefined at that point.

But in the graph if a = 1 it looks like it is than f(x) = 4

So the logic of the limit is approaching to not equal to. (what's the difference?)

it will be like this:

When we say x=1 then x is on.

But if we say then it could be 1.00000....0001 or 9.9999....999, x will not be 1 it will just be close to one.

So looking at the graph you may see h it is mean the rate of change of x most of the time we will like h or dx approaches to 0.