Difference between revisions of "Talk:Time Management with timeline"

From PKC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys (@Kevin & @Jared) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most immin...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys (@Kevin & @Jared) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most imminent in your own localized contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Truth", such as a single wiki, to ensure the consistency and reusability of the chosen names. --[[User:Benkoo|Benkoo]] ([[User talk:Benkoo|talk]]) 09:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys ([[User:KevinTung|Kevin]] & [[User:Baliforester|Jared]]) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most imminent in your own localized contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Truth", such as a single wiki, to ensure the consistency and reusability of the chosen names. --[[User:Benkoo|Benkoo]] ([[User talk:Benkoo|talk]]) 09:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:22, 15 July 2021

The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys (Kevin & Jared) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most imminent in your own localized contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Truth", such as a single wiki, to ensure the consistency and reusability of the chosen names. --Benkoo (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)