Difference between revisions of "Talk:Time Management with timeline"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Template:Logic Model | {{Template:Logic Model | ||
context=The lack of named spatial/temporal contexts will cause confusion in the process of communication | |context=The lack of named spatial/temporal contexts will cause confusion in the process of communication | ||
goal=Use [[Logic Model]] to capture [[context]], [[goal]], [[success criteria]] in Wiki. | |goal=Use [[Logic Model]] to capture [[context]], [[goal]], [[success criteria]] in Wiki. | ||
criteria=Seeing [[Logic Model]] as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes [[named entities]]. | |criteria=Seeing [[Logic Model]] as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes [[named entities]]. | ||
outputs=A [[Logic Model]] written by each page's verifier in [[PKC]]. | |outputs=A [[Logic Model]] written by each page's verifier in [[PKC]]. | ||
process=A compositional [[process]] to relate [[Inputs]] with [[Outputs]]. | |process=A compositional [[process]] to relate [[Inputs]] with [[Outputs]]. | ||
inputs=#[[PKC]] access # [[Content Creator]] #[[Page Verification Process]] | |inputs=#[[PKC]] access # [[Content Creator]] #[[Page Verification Process]] | ||
boundaries= The intersection of [[arrogance]] and [[stupidity]]. | |boundaries= The intersection of [[arrogance]] and [[stupidity]]. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 09:44, 15 July 2021
Process Anti-Pattern Observation
The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys (Kevin & Jared) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and re-usability of the chosen names. This mental laziness causes systematic misunderstanding, and most seriously, delayed the possibility to make progress in a reasonable speed. Moreover, the explicit statement that all of your actions must be put into a Logic Model, which you both conveniently ignored, repeatedly caused our communication to go into directions that goes no where. This is really a sad condition that is now being documented here. One more time, all pages are specialization of the Logic Model, and this page included, must have a Logic Model. --Benkoo (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model
to Template:LogicModel
1. Context |
The lack of named spatial/temporal contexts will cause confusion in the process of communication | ||
2. Goal |
Use Logic Model to capture context, goal, success criteria in Wiki. | ||
3. Success Criteria |
Seeing Logic Model as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes named entities. | ||
4. Outputs | 5. Process | 6. Inputs | |
A Logic Model written by each page's verifier in PKC. |
| ||
7. Boundary Conditions |