Revision as of 17:10, 18 July 2021

TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model to Template:LogicModel

1. Context	After defining the scope, the project should be specified so that it is precise enough for implementation.
2. Goal	To specify the system using a formal/semi-formal specification and Logic model.
3. Success Criteria	The specification completely covers the system The specification can be compiled correctly The goal is reached before end time
4. Outputs	5. Process	6. Inputs
Project specification	Understand and specifying the workflows in PKC.	The knowledge of resources. The knowledge of integrating resource in PKC
7. Boundary Conditions

All kinds of workflows

The workflows are managed in Manual namespaces.

By Jenkins Remote Access API :

Download the Docker Image and build the PKC instance by up.sh. Then a docker container instance is built.
For any updates, save the new image file in docker registry with a named TAG.
Push the registered local image on the docker hub.
The image should be tested and then deployed for use.

For each workflow, do we need to track whether users follow the workflow and succeeds in order to verify the event? --KevinTung (talk) 17:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Should we discern the automated workflow with the manual one? Or are we supposed to specify all necessary parts of workflow? --KevinTung (talk) 17:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Project needs to be accountable. --Benkoo (talk) 07:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 == Discussion ==
-For each workflow, how do we track and verify the event?
+{{:Talk:Project specification}}
-How do we describe the management for each resources in a high-level?
-* How do we define "Resource Management" ?
 == Formal Methods ==
 * TLA workflow