Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Start time | 2021-08-25T08:00:00.000Z |
|---|---|
| End time | 2021-08-25T09:30:00.000Z |
| Attendees | @BenKoo, @KevinTung |
| Context | [[Event context::PKC Workflow/Process/TLA Workflow/Planning]] |
| Goal | Discuss About TLA Workflow |
| Criteria | The neccasary information is communicated |
| Meeting URL | https://zoom.us/j/92921308938?pwd=dFhwSXBreDBmd3ZLSHIzNkplaHVvUT09 |
Input
Process
Output
Meta
The strategy of namespace management now is to place the form of the data as its prefix, and the semantics as its postfix. Such as
Chat/Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung Video/Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTun
As the form is limited, the top-level of the namespace is more compact.
However, it is also possible to use the primary semantic of the data as its prefix, such as
Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung/Chat Meeting/2021.08.25/Ben,KevinTung/Video
The possible benefit is to have better control over the resources under the prefix, which is a common practice. It is also possible to use multiple hierarchical structures to manage ontologies. So there will be fixed structure and fluid structure.
I think it is an important part of Namespace Management open to discussion.