Talk:Time Management with timeline

TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model to Template:LogicModel

1. Context	After repeatedly stated the necessity of the use of Logic Model to ground the semantics of each page, the lack of Logic Model in the current development of Time Management page, causes ongoing confusion in the developmental process of this demonstrative page.
2. Goal	Use Logic Model to capture context, goal, success criteria in Wiki.
3. Success Criteria	Seeing Logic Model as a formal data structure to be included in pages that describes named entities.
4. Outputs	5. Process	6. Inputs
A Logic Model written and verified by each page's verifier in PKC.	A compositional process to relate Inputs with Outputs.	PKC access Content Creator Page Verification Process
7. Boundary Conditions	The intersection of arrogance and stupidity.

Process Anti-Pattern Observation

The whole point of using PKC is to leverage its powers in managing Namespaces. And you guys (Kevin & Jared) have been selfishly define namespaces in ways that are most convenient in your own private contexts, without thinking about Namespaces must be put in a "Single Source of Shared Truth", such as a single wiki or Git repository, to ensure the consistency and re-usability of the chosen names. This mental laziness causes systematic misunderstanding, and most seriously, delayed the possibility to make progress in a reasonable speed. Moreover, the explicit statement that all of your actions must be put into a Logic Model, which you both conveniently ignored, repeatedly caused our communication to go into directions that goes no where. This is really a sad condition that is now being documented here. One more time, all pages are specialization of the Logic Model, and this page included, must have a Logic Model. --Benkoo (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)