Difference between revisions of "Inter-Organizational Workflow"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|goal= | |goal= | ||
# Develop distributed and centralized [[Data Security|security system]] based on PKC. | # Develop distributed and centralized [[Data Security|security system]] based on PKC. | ||
# [[wikipedia:System integration|System integration]] of [[wikipedia:content management system|content management system]] and [[Category:Software|automation tools]] so that [[target workflows::data copy, transfer, and testing]] could be automated and triggered in PKC. | # [[wikipedia:System integration|System integration]] of [[wikipedia:content management system|content management system]] and [[:Category:Software|automation tools]] so that [[target workflows::data copy, transfer, and testing]] could be automated and triggered in PKC. | ||
# Utilize [[Software#Verification/Compilation Software|formal methods]] to prove the system's [[Criteria:Soundness|soundness]] | # Utilize [[Software#Verification/Compilation Software|formal methods]] to prove the system's [[Criteria:Soundness|soundness]] | ||
# Use PKC to manage the project itself so that all the work could be accounted. | # Use PKC to manage the project itself so that all the work could be accounted. |
Revision as of 14:51, 25 July 2021
1. Context |
| ||
2. Goal |
| ||
3. Success Criteria |
| ||
4. Boundary Conditions |
|
notes: output: concept-instance difference. inputs: system spec:
intended to use Function Model, but turn to Logic model to specify intention.
A logic model is composed of lots of submodels. When not intending to specify the abstract part of them, one could only use Function Model. A question is: What is the relationship between the model submodules, and the relationships among all the subfunctions?
TLA Sub-Model
TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model
to Template:LogicModel
1. Context |
| ||
2. Goal |
| ||
3. Success Criteria |
| ||
4. Outputs | 5. Process | 6. Inputs | |
|
|||
7. Boundary Conditions |
|
- Modeling system in the code-level depends on the order of execution while modeling with logical conditions doesn't.
todo : meta data of "the op data?" of writing a logic model
Jenkins Sub-Model
TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model
to Template:LogicModel
1. Context |
| ||
2. Goal |
| ||
3. Success Criteria |
| ||
4. Outputs | 5. Process | 6. Inputs | |
|
|
| |
7. Boundary Conditions |
|
Note: Sometimes, the input and process are ambiguous. For example, the Service namespace is required to achieve the goal. It might be an input or the product along the process. In general, both the input and process contain uncertainty and need a decision.
Docker Workflow
TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model
to Template:LogicModel
1. Context |
| ||
2. Goal |
| ||
3. Success Criteria |
| ||
4. Outputs | 5. Process | 6. Inputs | |
|
|
| |
7. Boundary Conditions |
|
Ideation Sub-Model
TO BE DEPRECATED: When you see this, please consider moving the logic model below from Template:Logic Model
to Template:LogicModel
1. Context | |||
2. Goal |
| ||
3. Success Criteria |
| ||
4. Outputs | 5. Process | 6. Inputs | |
|
|||
7. Boundary Conditions |
|
- Software Resource
- Work Breakdown Structure
- Meeting and Communication
- Issue
- Updates and reports
- Documentation
- Activities
- PKC Workflow/Drafts